I Tried 5 AI Testing Tools — Here’s What Actually Worked

I Tried 5 AI Testing Tools — Here’s What Actually Worked

I ran real-world code through CodiumAI, Testim, QA Wolf, Diffblue, and GPT. Some impressed me, others wasted my time.

Developers spend 30–50% of their time testing and debugging. It’s essential — but also slow, repetitive, and often the least glamorous part of the job.

So if AI can already write code, the obvious question is: can it test it too?

I tried a handful of AI testing tools to see if they actually speed things up or just add noise. Here’s what I found.

Why AI for testing makes sense

Testing is repetitive by design. Unit tests check predictable logic, end-to-end (E2E) tests simulate user flows, regression tests re-run the same scripts over and over.

That’s exactly the kind of grunt work AI is well-suited for.

Instead of manually writing boilerplate tests, you can ask an AI to:

  • Generate unit tests for existing functions
  • Suggest edge cases you didn’t think of
  • Automate user flows for E2E coverage

“AI testing doesn’t replace QA — it just gives you more coverage faster.

But not all tools are created equal. Let’s break them down.

Tools worth trying

Not all AI testing tools solve the same problem. Some focus on unit test scaffolding, others on automating E2E flows, and a few are built for enterprise-level coverage. Here are the most notable ones.

CodiumAI

CodiumAI plugs into VS Code and JetBrains and generates unit tests based on your functions. It analyzes code paths, proposes edge cases, and builds the skeleton of your test suite for you.

Say you wrote this JavaScript function:

function calculateDiscount(price, percentage) {
  if (percentage < 0 || percentage > 100) {
    throw new Error("Invalid discount percentage");
  }
  return price * (1 - percentage / 100);
}

CodiumAI might generate Jest tests like this:

test('applies a 10% discount', () => {
  expect(calculateDiscount(100, 10)).toBe(90);
});
test('no discount applied when percentage is 0', () => {
  expect(calculateDiscount(100, 0)).toBe(100);
});
test('throws error for negative percentage', () => {
  expect(() => calculateDiscount(100, -5)).toThrow();
});
test('throws error for percentage over 100', () => {
  expect(() => calculateDiscount(100, 120)).toThrow();
});

It’s the kind of tool you’d use when you want quick test coverage without hand-writing every case, but you still need to sanity-check its output — especially if your business logic has edge cases CodiumAI can’t understand.

Testim (by Tricentis)

Testim is an AI-powered platform for building end-to-end (E2E) tests. Instead of hand-coding Selenium, you can visually record user flows (like login, checkout, or search), and Testim stabilizes the selectors so tests are less brittle when the UI changes.

For example, you record a login flow: open /login, type in email and password, click “Login,” and check that the dashboard loads. Testim generates the test for you and re-runs it every time you deploy:

it('should log in successfully', async () => {
  await page.goto('/login');
  await page.fill('#email', '[email protected]');
  await page.fill('#password', 'password123');
  await page.click('#login-btn');
  await expect(page).toHaveURL('/dashboard');
});

It’s a good fit for teams who run a lot of regression tests on web apps and don’t want brittle scripts breaking every week. Just don’t expect it to be completely hands-off — dynamic apps still need human oversight.

QA Wolf

QA Wolf isn’t just a tool — it’s testing-as-a-service. You describe a scenario (“a user adds an item to the cart, checks out, and receives a confirmation email”), and QA Wolf creates and maintains the E2E tests for you using Playwright under the hood.

That means if your UI changes, their human-in-the-loop testers update the scripts. You get coverage without burning dev time on writing or fixing tests.

Here’s a generated snippet from a checkout flow:

test('user can complete checkout flow', async ({ page }) => {
  await page.goto('/');
  await page.click('text=Add to Cart');
  await page.click('text=Checkout');
  await page.fill('#email', '[email protected]');
  await page.click('text=Place Order');
  await expect(page.locator('h1')).toHaveText('Order Confirmed');
});

It’s great for small teams or startups who don’t have QA engineers on staff. The tradeoff is that you’re outsourcing part of your testing, so you lose a bit of control.

Diffblue (for Java)

Diffblue is built specifically for Java and auto-generates JUnit tests at scale. Enterprises with massive Java codebases use it to bootstrap coverage, especially for legacy code.

Take this simple method:

public double calculateInterest(double principal, double rate, int years) {
    return principal * Math.pow(1 + rate, years);
}

Diffblue might generate:

@Test
public void testCalculateInterest_basic() {
    assertEquals(1102.5, calculateInterest(1000, 0.05, 2), 0.01);
}
@Test
public void testCalculateInterest_zeroPrincipal() {
    assertEquals(0, calculateInterest(0, 0.05, 5), 0.01);
}
@Test
public void testCalculateInterest_negativeRate() {
    assertEquals(902.5, calculateInterest(1000, -0.05, 2), 0.01);
}

If you’re working in a big Java shop, this saves months of tedious work. But if you’re not using Java, it won’t do anything for you.

ChatGPT / Copilot Chat / Cursor

These aren’t dedicated QA platforms, but they’re surprisingly handy as test assistants. Paste in a function and ask for tests, and they’ll give you a starting point.

Take this palindrome checker:

function isPalindrome(str) {
  return str === str.split('').reverse().join('');
}

GPT might suggest tests like:

test('detects racecar as palindrome', () => {
  expect(isPalindrome('racecar')).toBe(true);
});
test('detects hello as not palindrome', () => {
  expect(isPalindrome('hello')).toBe(false);
});
test('empty string is palindrome', () => {
  expect(isPalindrome('')).toBe(true);
});

It’s not perfect — sometimes it suggests redundant or irrelevant tests — but for quick ideas, especially in solo projects, it’s a time-saver. You just wouldn’t rely on it as your main QA process.

Where AI testing helps most

  • Unit test coverage: AI can quickly cover basic branches you might forget.
  • Edge case discovery: Suggests inputs and scenarios you wouldn’t think of.
  • QA co-pilot: For solo devs or small teams, it’s like having a second pair of eyes without the overhead.

Where it still fails

AI still struggles with:

  • False positives: Suggesting meaningless or redundant tests.
  • System context: It can’t fully understand how components interact across the system.
  • Maintenance: Generated tests still need updating when the code changes.

“AI can write your first 80% of tests — but the last 20% still needs human judgment.”

How to choose the right tool

Different workflows call for different tools. Here’s the quick breakdown:

  • If you’re a solo dev or indie hacker, CodiumAI or ChatGPT will save you time on unit tests.
  • If you’re a small team, Testim or QA Wolf can handle regression and E2E coverage.
  • If you’re an enterprise stuck with a massive Java codebase, Diffblue is basically built for you.

Wrapup

Testing won’t disappear, and AI won’t make QA obsolete. But it can make the process less painful.

Instead of writing boilerplate for hours, you let AI scaffold the basics. You still refine, validate, and handle the edge cases that only a human with context can understand.

Your teammates will still argue about architecture decisions — but at least you won’t be wasting time on repetitive test scripts.

Now I’m curious — have you tried letting AI generate tests for your code? Which tool actually helped, and which one wasted your time? Drop your experience in the comments — I’d love to feature real-world feedback in a follow-up.

“AI testing can help you write tests, but the responsibility is still in you”

I Tried 5 AI Testing Tools — Here’s What Actually Worked was originally published in Javarevisited on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

This post first appeared on Read More

Related Posts